Join our discussion with Facility Influencer John Rimer on Sept. 13
The Las Vegas show takes place Oct. 29-30. Members receive complimentary Elite Level access
Given all the technology innovation in HVAC over the past few years, facility managers have a range of new options to consider. Evaluating those products means looking broadly at their impact on the organization. That broader look should start with basic economic questions like budget and ROI.
“Capital is sorely restricted in our industry,” says Joe Taylor, executive director of facilities for Owensboro Health. “So we have to make really good choices.”
That challenge isn’t limited to hospitals. In any organization, physical assets compete with other possible investments for organizational dollars. In healthcare, for example, competition for capital may include diagnostic or surgical equipment. “I have to make a case that a facility capital project is going to help achieve the organization’s mission,” says Taylor.
One obvious way HVAC equipment can do that is by reducing energy use. Energy efficient equipment can also reduce a facility’s carbon footprint, a growing concern for many hospitals and other organizations. At the same time, of course, new HVAC systems can reduce energy costs. And those savings drop to the bottom line.
“If I save $100,000 a year in energy costs over what I would typically spend, that’s $100,000 more that’s available on the patient care side,” Taylor says. “So we’re no longer just an expense department. We actually have the ability to contribute on the income side by returning expense dollars to the organization.”
But ROI in HVAC can’t be evaluated solely in terms of payback. The HVAC system has a broad impact on occupants. In healthcare, it’s important to evaluate the way an HVAC product will affect patient care and satisfaction parameters, says Taylor. “Is it going to help us reduce our length of stay? Is it going to help us reduce our readmissions? Is it going to help us provide a more pleasing patient experience?”
It’s also important to consider maintenance costs, says Michael McArdle, an HVAC engineer with buildings and grounds services for the State of Vermont. One factor to weigh is whether maintenance is performed by in-house staff or by contractors. Either way, maintenance costs are important, but in the latter case a reduction in maintenance also reduces spending.
McArdle works with operating staff in designing HVAC systems to ensure that they will be maintenance friendly. “In this case, we’ve learned more from maintenance than the specifying architect,” he says.
When it comes to new technologies, Taylor wants evidence that it has been well researched and accepted within the healthcare industry. “It’s a critical technology and not to be purchased lightly,” he says. But that doesn’t mean he’s not interested in what’s new. He looks for case studies as well as chances to speak with peers in healthcare who use the technology and can tell him how clinical staff has accepted the system and what results it has achieved. And he looks to broader industry discussions of the emerging technology. “As the industry starts to accept a technology, I like to follow the progression of that acceptance,” he says.
The pay-off for that homework: being able to take advantage of advances in technology while avoiding the risks of unproven systems.
Email comments and questions to edward.sullivan@tradepress.com.
Technology Innovation in HVAC Means FMs Have Range of New Options