fnPrime



NIST Releases New Document on Avoiding Progressive Building Collapse



The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a new guide to help building owners and engineers avoided progressive collapse of multi-story buildings, similar to the collapse of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 following a terrorist attack.


By CleanLink Editorial Staff  


The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a new guide to help building owners and engineers avoided progressive collapse of multi-story buildings, similar to the collapse of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 following a terrorist attack.

Progressive collapse is the spread of an initial local structural failure by chain reaction that results in the collapse of an entire structure or a disproportionately large part of it, according to NIST.

The report, Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings, argues that although no building system can be engineered and constructed to be absolutely risk-free, risk-informed assessment and decision-making can reduce the risk of progressive collapse. According to the researchers, engineers must not simply work to the minimum requirements of the building code; they need to consider ways to improve structural integrity and robustness to accommodate local failures.

According to NIST engineers, hazards that increase the risk of local structural failures that, in turn, can lead to a partial or complete progressive collapse include design and construction errors, fire, gas explosion, the transport and storage of hazardous materials, vehicular collision, and bomb explosions.

The NIST report cites a lack of continuity of support within a building system, a lack of ductility in structural materials, members and connections, and lack of structural redundancy in providing alternate load paths as critical factors that limit structural integrity. The use of large-paneled or bearing wall construction, for example, can limit continuity and ductility. Such systems may be poorly suited to absorb or dissipate energy resulting from unforeseen events such as gas explosion and sabotage.

The guide catalogs a number of cost-effective engineering solutions for retrofitting existing structures.

The document summarizes “existing knowledge” for use by engineers in making risk-informed planning and design decisions. It is not intended to provide step-by-step guidance. Appendix A describes applicable design standards from around the world. Appendix B identifies research needs relevant to progressive collapse. Appendix C provides case studies of progressive collapse.




Contact FacilitiesNet Editorial Staff »

  posted on 3/23/2007   Article Use Policy




Related Topics: